At the end of my last post, I was discussing the question of who paid the rent for the tower (and I should have given credit to my friend Nick Fargnoli, who first pointed this issue out to me), and I invoked the biographical record of Joyce’s actual life. Now, I understand the risks of the biographical fallacy (which is especially prevalent in Joyce-studies, for obvious reasons, especially after Ellmann): however, the relationship between “life” and “art” is a crucial one in Ulysses, and one which is particularly foregrounded in the second episode, for which Joyce specified the art of “History” in his schema; but he could just as well have said “memory,” or “fiction.”
The second episode begins with a history lesson, regarding the empire-building battles of ancient Rome. Memory is evoked from the outset:
Fabled by the daughters of memory. And yet it was in some way if not as memory fabled it. A phrase, then, of some impatience, thud of Blake’s wings of excess. I hear the ruin of all space, shattered glass and toppling masonry, and time one livid final flame. What’s left us then? (2.7-10)
The allusion to Blake in the first sentence (which, for once, Stephen is kind enough to tell us from whom he’s quoting) sets up an interesting dualism by which to consider Joyce’s craft: Fable vs. Memory. Ulysses is fiction (fable), but it was born from memory, as the Muses were born of Zeus and Mnemosyne. And yet, it is not memory: it is “in some way… not as memory fabled it.” What is the relationship of the memory to the fiction? For that matter, what is the relationship of memory to history (which is really just another form of fiction, as historiographers such as Hayden White [certainly not the first to say so] like to tell us)? “History [is] a tale like any other too often heard” (2.46-7).
Memory is fallible, as the first page of this episode goes to great lengths to establish: the students “forget the place,” which Stephen is only able to remind them of by glancing at his “gorescarred book”: writing, of course, is just a form of “mnemotechnic” (a favorite word of Bloom’s), and evolutionary psychologists point out with the rise of writing a concomitant decline of memory: see the difference between oral and written cultures (a difference especially pertinent in this book of all books, where a great oral epic provides the “basis” for a very written epic).
And why is the book “gorescarred”? This word cuts several ways. We can consider the abuse a school textbook is likely to suffer leaving it stained and marked; but perhaps the “gore” is the gore of the battles being described on the page. Consider, also, the circumstances under which the book we are reading was written. Ulysses (whenever Joyce mentions a book, one can assume, narcissist that he is, he is talking about his own), written in a Europe in the grip of the First World War: the compositional circumstances of this book leave it more than a little “gorescarred” itself. Granted, the scene is set before the war, but Joyce licenses a collapse of time, of writing and memory, in the above-quoted paragraph: “I hear the ruin of all space, shattered glass and toppling masonry, and time one livid final flame.” Note the subtle sliding of tenses, “shattered glass” (past) and “toppling masonry” (present), calling to mind images not of the ancient battle of Tarentum, but the more contemporary vision of Europe in flames. (I owe this observation to a lecture of Eddie Epstein’s).
Joyce possibly gives us a clue to his use of history in the address of one of Stephen’s students: “Vico Road, Dalkey” (2.25). While certainly a reference to a rather prosperous suburb of Dublin, the name Vico evokes for any fan of Finnegans Wake the Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico, whose circular theory of history dominates Joyce’s final work. History, like memory, is a repetition: we don’t “member” something, we “REmember” something. Memory is always a coming-again. The argument of this passage seems to be that history is, as well. (For an interesting reading of Joyce’s sense of history in this episode, see this brief post by my fellow Wakean, David Auerbach).
The sense of repetition is crucial here: the students ask Stephen to tell them a ghoststory, a tale of the dead coming back again. And Ulysses is certainly haunted: we have already seen how Stephen is pursued by the wraith of his mother, and he’s not the only one dealing with ghosts in this book. Instead of the requested story, Stephen has them turn to “Lycidas,” a memorial elegy to Milton’s late friend: so, perhaps a sort of ghoststory after all. But the student reading aloud doesn’t turn the page, instead repeating the lines he just read. These kinds of repetitions riddle the chapter: another student is instructed to copy problems from the board, but is unable to do them for himself. Later he dries his page with blotting paper, creating another copy-trace. (I’m tempted to go all poststructuralist here, with “traces” and “iterability” and all that floating around, but I will restrain myself [for the time being]). “Futility,” thinks Stephen, in the face of these repetitions.
His subsequent meeting with Mr. Deasy only reinforces this sense: “As it was in the beginning, is now” (2.200-1); “The same room and hour, the same wisdom: and I the same.” (2.232-3). Stephen fingers shells, traces of life; Deasy gives him money, traces of labor and value, and lectures him on history and memory:
I saw three generations since O’Connell’s time. I remember the famine in ’46. Do you know that the orange lodges agitated for repeal of the union twenty years before O’Connell did or before the prelates of your communion denounced him as a demagogue? You fenians forget some things. (2.268-72)
The same words from the first page recur: “remember,” “forget”: we also add “repeal” to our list of “re-” words, giving a political valence to our repetitions. Deasy is playing in Irish politics, writing letters: Stephen has to wait while he makes copies, transferring from manuscript to typescript, erasing errors (again, one thinks of Joyce’s own struggles to get his text together). In contrast to Stephen’s Blakean/Viconian vision of the timeless reiterations of history, Deasy presents the orthodox teleological Christian vision: “All human history moves towards one great goal, the manifestation of God” (2.379-80). One can guess what Joyce thought of that idea by Stephen’s response: “That is God […] A shout in the street.”
All these reflections on the endless repetitions of history lead Stephen to utter his famous remark, “History is a nightmare from which I am trying to awake” (2.377). I can’t help but think of Freud, whose Beyond the Pleasure Principle was published a mere two years before Ulysses, so it is unlikely that Joyce would have read it. But in this episode he provides us with his own, fully realized vision of the repetition compulsion made famous in Freud’s essay.
Fantastic stuff. Having read ahead and finished next week’s episodes (and having in fact reread Calypso just tonight), I can see that cycles will be important.
Regarding the toppling masonry, I note that glass shatters instantly, while masonry has a tendency to topple a stone or a few stones at a time, over time. Toppling masonry can exist in the past, I think. Some monuments that have been toppling for centuries topple still. It’s an interesting observation nevertheless, and maybe I’m full of it.
I took the “Lycidas” reference to be a sort of cue that Stephen, like the Milton who wrote “Lycidas,” was at a point in his life at which he was looking ahead (to fresh woods and pastures new) to what he planned to achieve artistically. Some things in episode 3 seem to suggest as much as well. That the young Milton was haunted by a death as Stephen is hadn’t occurred to me. I mention this all as a side note and not as any sort of refutation of what you’re saying about Joyce’s use of the repetition of lines from Milton’s poem.
Your post made me think of an old song Elvis song entitled “I Forgot to Remember to Forget.”
As chapters of the book go, “Nestor” has some really great quotable spots but is often over-looked in our memory of the book. I believe that part of this is because the narrative voice and descriptive sense in less bombastic here as it is some of the more “singsong” moments of the book. It does seem more “drawingroom dry” than the kind of passages we in later chapters set around and in an energetic city environment.
But Daryl’s mention of reading ahead brings up a point I’ve been waiting for. The synchronicity of events in Bloom’s morning and in Stephen’s.
In adapting ULYSSES into a comic I spent a lot of time thinking about the presentation of these early chapters and how the language of comics handles “jump cuts” better than a novel might. So I’ll be presenting things in chronological order in my adaptation rather than in the order presented in the novel. This is due, almost entirely, to the way the events in “Nestor” line up with events in episode five, “The Lotus Eaters”.
I don’t want to put any spoilers in here since I know that “Lotus Eaters” is on this week’s reading schedule, but for those of you who’ve made it through that chapter think about how the circular repetition of history and education through copying Judd mentions above might be countered by Mr Bloom’s dreamy wandering through the regular cycles of an Irishman’s day. How stupefied and stupefying the world seems to both Stephen and Bloom and how they relate to it. Then think about how certain quotes and events from both chapters align themselves. It’s a dizzyingly brilliant set of connections Joyce makes in the novel that are surprising when read one chapter after the other.
On the repetition theme: Stephen, in asking his charges to open their books to Milton’s Lycidas, asks them to turn to a poem whose first three words are “Yet once more.” [The boys, apparently, have already read a bit further down, to the words “Weep no more,” which as you say, Judd, are then repeated. So it’s deja vu all over again.]
Thanks, guys, for the input. These are ideas I’m still working out: this is a chapter I always end up sort of neglecting, in favor of later episodes. I also neglected to mention, in discussing history vs. fiction, the Odyssey connection– Gifford notes Athena’s words to Telemachus in Book III: “Go to old Nestor, master charioteer, / so we may broach the storehouse of his mind. / Ask him with courtesy, and in his wisdom / he will tell you history and no lies” (3:17-20; Fitzgerald, p.48). Joyce seems to be parodying the assumption that history can ever be anything *but* lies.
i guess i never noticed how much copying goes on in this chapter. & of course so many repeated items come back later in the book, like the fox/grandmother riddle, in which stephen seems to be the fox digging up the earth (“And you who wrest old images from the burial earth?” l. 11617 in the online concordance).
another cool moment is stephen imagining telling his “disappointed bridge” joke to haines & mulligan at the ship. he creates a memory of something that hasn’t happened yet, & actually won’t happen. yet it does happen in his mind, so doesn’t it become a memory in some sense? how many of our memories never actually happened at all?
Good point: in a way, that could serve as a definition of fiction, “memories that never happened.” There’s a correlation to the moment in the first episode where Mulligan mentions “Clive Kempthorpe” and Stephen imagines/remembers a whole scene at Oxford, where of course he’s never been (1.165-175).
yes, & the gardener outside hearing it; stephen has even imagined a different NARRATOR for the scene!
Hi there to all, the contents present at this site are in fact awesome for people knowledge, well, keep up the good work fellows.
I have read so many articles or reviews regbarding the blogger lovers except this piece of writing is truly a
fastidious article, keep it up.